Author Archive

Who Owns This Land? The Council or the 22K Residents?

October 2, 2022

TAPinto Summit

By Delia Hamlet

My name is Delia Hamlet – your candidate for Ward 1 Common Council.  I have been asked by many residents why I am running to serve our wonderful community and what makes me the best candidate for the job, and I am excited to share those reasons with you.  I feel that it’s important to know that I have no agenda other than making Summit better. Period. I am not a politician by background and I don’t plan to pursue any higher office.  I do, however, believe that my professional experiences and skill set will help me provide the right voice that is desperately needed on Council.  

Priorities

My priorities are interrelated, and I look forward to following up on each in more detail in forthcoming candidate statements and speaking with you when I am out door knocking.  My main priorities include:

Broad Street West Development – We must restart this process and leverage what we’ve learned and remind ourselves that six council members do not own this land, the 22,000 residents of Summit do, and I know first hand that they have extraordinary ideas.  Pushing a similar rendition of the current proposal forward is clearly NOT what the majority of our community wants, and I’ll fight for you to make sure we get it right.

Safety – As in any community, pedestrian and public safety is a hot topic that can always be improved with innovative ideas, streamlined communication between local government and residents, and continuing to support our brave police and fire departments who keep us safe and penalize bad actors.  I am excited to share more ideas with you on safety and hear more about what is important to you.

Communication/Transparency – I believe that communication between City Hall and Summit residents can be improved immensely.  Whether it’s the timeliness of alerts released by the city or simply doing a better job getting important information into residents’ hands, other than their tax bill, such as Broad Street West related information, I think we can do better, and I will fight for it.

Background

More background on me – A veteran, a business owner, a volunteer.  I am a Mom of three children who attend the Summit public school system. I am an Army Veteran, and I am honored to have served our country overseas during 9/11.  They were difficult times, however that experience has shaped me in many ways.  And it reminds me daily of why community is important.  When fighting for our country, no one asks about your party affiliation.  It just doesn’t matter. And it shouldn’t matter in local government.  I am very proud to have the honor to be working with republicans, democrats, unaffiliated voters, essentially what I would boil down to the “great neighbors” of Summit.  We are a diverse community with different backgrounds, and you all inspire me to do better, so thank you for that!

I am a business owner with 40 employees.   We recently gut renovated a 50K square foot military gym and turned it into a multi-sport facility with over 1350 members in under a year.  We are just about to hit our 1-year anniversary.  Not every day is paradise as a business owner, but I am solving problems that directly impact our bottom line and our people every day. 

I have witnessed how wonderful Summit is.  I served on the Board of my children’s preschool and elementary school. I coached Girls on the Run and Summit Recreation basketball. My children are involved in various athletics and activities at different age groups.  My point is…I know how wonderful Summit is.  And that is exactly why I am so passionate about maintaining the character of our unique town.  That is also why I am so passionate about making sure there is a public benefit to the residents of Summit for every decision I make. And it’s important to remember that we are all neighbors that should be working together as a team for the future of this wonderful city.

Broad Street West redevelopment

Broad Street West is by far the most pressing issue that residents speak with me about on a day-to-day basis.  They tell me that they have had enough, and they are begging to be included, and for the city to do better.  While I understand and applaud that there has been a tremendous amount of work put into BSW in prior years, I don’t believe that should blind us from who we represent, and what they are asking for.  Residents are asking me to hit the full reset button on Broad Street West and I plan to do my best to carry out their wishes.  If we move forward with the Broad Street West redevelopment in any form, the City of Summit will fundamentally change forever and that is why we need to be thoughtful and inclusive when making these decisions.

Maintaining historic Summit and the suburban lifestyle for all residents is essential, and you have my commitment to maintain and protect Summit as the city we chose to live in and raise our children.

A smart resident stated at a recent Council Meeting that Broad Street West is the one thing that has brought democrats and republicans together for the first time in a long time.  If you are happy with the process and output of BSW – I am not your candidate. 

Thank You

If elected I won’t stop door knocking, because the people’s voice is the only voice that matters.

I look forward to the honor of earning your vote between now and November 8th.

If you missed the debate check it out below.  For a rookie, I think I held my own and have some practical ideas to help Summit.

Delia Hamlet is running for election to the Summit Common Coiunci representing Ward 1.

Public Forum Showcases Summit Common Council Ward 1 Candidates’ Positions

October 2, 2022

TAPinto Summit

By Karen Ann Kurlander

SUMMIT, NJ – Ward 1 Common Council candidates Danny O’Sullivan (D), the Incumbent, and challenger Delia Hamlet (R) faced-off at a candidates forum sponsored by the League of Women Voters (LWV) of Berkley Heights, New Providence, and Summit on September 28.

The session, held at the Summit Free Public Library, was moderated by Katherine Balch of the LWV of Plainfield. While the League of Women Voters is non-partisan, the audience was not. It had to be admonished by the moderator after breaking out in applause twice during Hamlet’s answers.

Each candidate had two minutes each for opening and closing statements. In between was a series of questions which had been submitted in advance by members of the public. Those questions were vetted by the LWV to ensure they didn’t contain personal attacks and that they pertained solely to issues that come before the Common Council.

SUMMIT, NJ – Ward 1 Common Council candidates Danny O’Sullivan (D), the Incumbent, and challenger Delia Hamlet (R) faced-off at a candidates forum sponsored by the League of Women Voters (LWV) of Berkley Heights, New Providence, and Summit on September 28.

The session, held at the Summit Free Public Library, was moderated by Katherine Balch of the LWV of Plainfield. While the League of Women Voters is non-partisan, the audience was not. It had to be admonished by the moderator after breaking out in applause twice during Hamlet’s answers.

Each candidate had two minutes each for opening and closing statements. In between was a series of questions which had been submitted in advance by members of the public. Those questions were vetted by the LWV to ensure they didn’t contain personal attacks and that they pertained solely to issues that come before the Common Council.

Candidate Introductions

O’Sullivan introduced himself by noting that he moved to Summit 16 years ago with his wife and three children, choosing the City “for its great schools and the safe community. As a bonus, we’ve made lifelong friendships.” In his opening statement, he noted how he’s “really proud of what we’ve accomplished during my first term. I’m asking for your support so that I can keep working on the issues that matter to all of Summit, issues that matter now and into the future.” His community involvement has included coaching his children’s sports teams, teaching religious education at St. Teresa’s, and volunteering on “numerous initiatives.” He served on Summit’s Economic Development Advisory Committee, which led him to pursue serving on council. “These experiences have enabled me to get to know Summit on a personal level, and have helped inform my decision-making so that I make the best choices for all of Summit.”

Hamlet noted that she is a mother of three and an Army veteran who served overseas during 9-11. “They were difficult times,” she said, “but it shaped me in many different ways, and it reminds me on a daily basis why community is important. When you’re fighting for your country, no one asks what your political party affiliation is, it just doesn’t matter. And it doesn’t matter in local government. Your main focus is … the mission gets accomplished.” In running, she says she has “no other agenda other than making Summit better. I am honored to have the support from Democrats, Republicans, and independent residents. I’ve been tremendously inspired by the residents and former elected leaders who’ve voiced their concerns around many important issues in Summit.” A business owner with 40 employees, Hamlet said “not every day is paradise as a business owner. But I am solving problems that directly impact our bottom line and our people every day.” She’s served on the board at Lincoln Hubbard Elementary, coached basketball at the community center, and coached Girls on the Run. “I know exactly how wonderful Summit is, and that’s exactly why I am so passionate about maintaining the character of our town. That is also why I am so passionate about making sure there is a public benefit to the residents of Summit for every decision we make.”

[Editor’s Note: Comments have been edited for space and clarity.]

Is there one particular issue that convinced you to run for Common Council?

DH: “[S]afety. I lived on Fernwood Road, and we had had several incidents…. That ignited my interest in local politics and really lit a fire for me to serve again. I would say that I work hard to try different initiatives. … Today we had another car theft outside of Club Pilates. … I think it’s something that is an ongoing issue, and we just have to continue to work with the county and other local officials to combat this problem. I applaud our police for all the hard work they do.”

DO’S: “My friend Beth Little ran her campaign in 2017, and she ran on Full-Day Kindergarten. And she delivered on that promise. I have that same belief that good government policy has a role to play in the lives of ordinary citizens. That inspired me to try to make a difference, so when I ran, one of my issues was outdoor recreation spaces. I delivered on those promises. We renovated our town pool, and we delivered on new basketball courts at Memorial and Tatlock. I do believe good government policy has a role to play in our lives right here in Summit, and you’ve seen it on display.” Addressing Hamlet, he added, “I believe we live in one of the safest communities anywhere…. Just go by the numbers. We have the finest police officers. Every category of crime is trending downwards with the exception of car thefts.…”

Hamlet countered, “I recently spoke with the Monmouth County Sheriff, and he explained to me …that auto theft is one of the number one problems in the community, even down in Monmouth County. It is a huge problem and I would say that a lot of these criminals can be armed, we can’t assume they’re not armed, and although Summit is one of the safest cities, I think that we can always make an attempt to continue.”

Summit is known as a sustainable and green city … That said, the recent drought and flash flooding are stark examples of climate change in New Jersey. What citywide environmental initiative would you like to see Summit prioritize going forward?

DO’S: I was recently endorsed by the Sierra Club of New Jersey. I have had a couple of green initiatives of my own. We continue to plant trees at a rapid pace around town, we have started food composting at the transfer station, and we have planted a tiny forest. All green initiatives. Going forward, one of my main focuses in my second term will be to capture federal grant money from the Inflation Reduction Act and the infrastructure bill. We need to convert our city fleet of vehicles to electric. We also need to find a way to have a solar installation so that we’re more resilient against power outages in the future.

DH: I went to visit the tiny forest a week or so ago, and I was one of the initial donors to Dr. [Robert] Rubino’s Park Line, so I’m certainly passionate about the environment. I think there are so many things that Summit can do. In the Broad Street West proposed project I would have liked to have seen more green space and more green initiatives with the buildings. I also noticed down at the tiny forest how the water has to get all the way from the top of the community center down to the tiny forest. There was some talk about potentially bringing the water from another area, so the tiny forest could be watered more often. I also sat on a call the other day; they had so many great ideas about the new grants that we can pursue. A lot of good things can happen in Summit.

What specific solutions do you have to make social services, food, and shelter available to the homeless people who are in and around the train station?

DH: I think we’ve all noticed there is certainly an increase at the train station recently. I was speaking with someone from GRACE today, and they talked about the fact that they had one person last year who they were able to get a full-time job and move through the program. There are so many things that GRACE does to help the homeless. We have to continue to advocate for them to get on the road to success, get jobs. I’m passionate about fixing that solution and helping them, just as I did in the military with my soldiers. We were always focused on getting them back on the right track. It’s an important issue to me.

DO’S: We have contracted with Bridgeway; they have helped with our mental health services. Specific solutions at the City level are very difficult. We don’t have budget money for care of the homeless, but I think the overall theme of taking care of people who are homeless is affordable housing. There is not enough affordable housing in New Jersey or Summit and so part of the reason why we’re going down this road of Broad Street West is to add more affordable units, because people fall through the cracks. And they are priced out of places like Summit. We’ve seen it time and again. We have solutions on the table to get more affordable housing in this town. It’s desperately needed and it’s obvious to everyone every time you walk through the train station. It could happen to anyone.

Mental health is a very important component of this, added Hamlet, saying that a priority “would be to get a lot of these individuals mental health [assistance]. As you know, it is suicide awareness month, and we haven’t spent a lot of time talking about that this month.” As to affordable housing, she feels “we need to sit down and figure out exactly what our requirement is, because I think some people are a little unclear.”

How can Summit be more welcoming of diversity, equality, and inclusion and how would you measure success?

DO’S: I don’t know if there is a measurement for success. I was proud to support the raising of the Pride flag at the community center in my first year on Council. We lit the Hanukkah menorah on the Village Green in the 2020 holiday season. We just celebrated Juneteenth for the first time ever in Summit. And all of the Asian-American Pacific Islander events we host. If you see a Pride flag at the community center, you know we are a welcoming community. If you see a menorah lit next to a Christmas tree at the Village Green, you know we have diversity, and we care about everybody here. When you celebrate Juneteenth with our African-American community, you know we’re making progress on these issues. We have a very welcoming community. I don’t know how you measure it, but I feel it. 

DH: As I door-knock, I can certainly see how we can probably be more inclusive. We do so many great things here in Summit to include everybody and make them a part of our community, because that’s what it is. We are one of the most diverse cities that I’ve ever been in. There’s one thing that I could recommend that we do to make people feel more included. The town Council meeting minutes are not in Spanish or other languages. And I think a lot of people have frustrations over that, and I think it’s an easy fix. The City’s website s multiple languages, but when you get to the meat and potatoes of it, it’s only in English. That would be a really good, easy start.

What plans do you have for improving pedestrian safety?

DH: As many of you know, there was a pedestrian hit a few weeks ago, and kudos to the mayor, who made a statement at the last Council meeting where she said we are going to be cracking down, ticketing more. So I think that the conversations that a lot of the residents have been having is sinking in. The mayor actually did a Facebook Live safety post, and I think that was helpful. I think that everybody needs to slow down. Unfortunately, we really need to start ticketing because someone is going to get hurt. One of the other important issues, especially down on Bedford Road, is the children who are going from the high school to the football field. That is a massive concern because people are parking on both sides of that road, and it is an accident waiting to happen. People are fired up down thee about that issue.

DO’S: Tragic accidents happen. A couple of years ago, a crossing guard was struck by a vehicle helping kids cross at the middle school. People are driving too fast. They are not paying attention. But overall, our pedestrians are safe. We’re fully confident that we have measures in place, even more so now than ever. There are more sidewalks than ever, we have bump-outs to control speed, we have traffic beacons to help people cross the street, we have narrowed intersections, we have speed humps on Woodland Avenue and Ashland Road to slow people down. But I think the mayor was correct — people need to slow down. If I drive 25 miles an hour anywhere in town where the speed limit is 25, there will be someone five feet behind me riding my bumper, guaranteed. People are out of control, and we need to slow down and be mindful.

Hamlet added that bike helmets are the law, but she sees so many children not wearing helmets. “I think it’s something the community should focus on and encourage our children to wear helmets more often.”

The Broad Street development plan is now on hold while Council looks for options. What modifications would you make to that redevelopment, traffic, and affordable housing?

DO’S: The steering committee has advised the developers to shrink the project and come back with something smaller. What would I do? I would like to see two four-story buildings with a path in between. We get enough, not as much as I would like, but we get enough affordable housing units out of it, we get market-rate apartments out of it, we get green space, we get sustainability features, maybe they bury the power lines over there. It’s all a negotiation that has to happen. It’s been a really difficult process. It’s been a democratic process, though. We have made tremendous progress, and I know it’s up-and-down progress, and it’s not what you want right away, but we have made tremendous progress. I’m proud of where we are; I’m proud of where the project is headed. 

DH: I respectfully disagree. I think the process has not been transparent, I think that 1700 residents or more have stood up against the project. We have seen countless residents who are peeling back the onion. Topology has been horrendous, the financial advisor was just removed, now we are starting a process with only a financial committee. I think that it would be wise to consider everything, including not doing redevelopment under redevelopment law. I think we have to think about all of our options. As I door-knock, I meet so many residents who are urban planners, who are architects. I went to Lincoln-Hubbard the other day and the number of people who have great ideas is amazing. We have a lot of smart people in this community. I think we need to be very specific. I actually had a call with [planner] Joe Burgis yesterday around where are we at exactly with the affordable housing requirement, because I think a lot of people are confused with the exact number. I think that would be helpful. I actually walked the area a few weeks ago; I have some renderings of what I would like, or what I’m hearing that residents would like.

O’Sullivan pointed out that the City has “hired a new financial advisor, we are bringing aboard financial experts who are local to Summit, so I’m thrilled about that. As far as the Area in Need of Redevelopment [ANR] process, right now we have control. Everyone in here has control of this project. If we abandon the Area in Need of Redevelopment law, we will lose control, and we don’t know what’d going to happen there.”

Hamlet responded that Summit residents pushed back “because the initial proposal was out of scale and out of character with what the residents wanted. And with all due respect, although Council is on a pause, I’m not sure if the public has seen any information regarding this two-buildings, four-stories-with-a-passthrough, and it’s frustrating for me as a candidate to having to discuss that information when I don’t think anybody has seen those plans.”

To clarify, said O’Sullivan, that was only his opinion, something he’s advocating for. “There are no concepts, no one has seen anything.”

In response, Hamlet suggested the important thing that everybody needs to remember is, or ask themselves, is, “who owns this land? Is it the council, or is it the 22,000 residents of Summit? It creates an area where residents don’t feel like they’re included.”

O’Sullivan answered that the ANR law “allows committees like the one we’re forming to come to the table. If this City land is sold to a developer, there will be no design advice, there will be no financial advisors from the community coming in to do this. So we’re in a good process right now. I ‘m happy that we have people in this room that are going to be at the table. We’ll have design people from this room in the next step.”

To this, Hamlet could only reply, “We totally disagree on this topic. This absolutely needs to be restarted, rethought, include the residents, 100 percent. Full stop.”

Should the finance advisory committee be kept as a financial-matters-only committee, or would you include design, traffic, and affordable housing?

DH: Absolutely, hands down, [the other areas] should have been a part of the process a long time ago, and I think that’s why the residents have spoken out. We have so many smart residents, they do this for a living, and I think it is only to our advantage to involve them. I started a business in a 50,000-square-foot renovated building. It’s really important to include all of that, because a lot of time the financial decisions are based on all of the things that are included in the design process. So absolutely, and I’m sure that is coming, and I think having it financial-only is not good for the town of Summit.

DO’S: I’m comfortable where we are. The financial team that we’re going to assemble, they’re a talented group, they’re motivated to help us. If they can’t make the numbers work, then thers really is no need for a design group. We’re going to be really back at the drawing board. So let’s just find out of they can make the numbers work, then we’ll move on to the next group, and we’ll invite more people in. If we lose control of this project, and the property is sold, there will be no design group, there will be no financial team helping, because the new owners will have all of that, and they’ll build whatever they want within the zoning laws.

“I think we’ve already lost this project,” countered Hamlet. “The fact that we had one bidder at the table, and we put the developers’ interests in front of our residents’, is quite honestly very frustrating. We have lost control of this project, and as a resident, and as a resident who’ll be representing you, I do not want anyone making financial decisions on a project that maybe you don’t want. And it is very important to me that this project takes a different direction.”

But the ANR law is clear, responded O’Sullivan, “one developer at the table at a time. They started off with 12 developers, and they got RFQs and RFPs and the steering committee whittled it down to this group, Toll Brothers and L&M Partners. This is all that the law allows right now. Having an open bid, no, it would be against the law.”

Hamlet disagreed. “I think you have to scrap ANR, start over, 100%, full stop. There is one bidder in the room. Scrap it.”

Name an example when the Summit Common Council was very transparent with residents; name an example where, in your opinion, there should have been more transparency on an issue.

DO’S: We’re as transparent as possible. Recent Councils have bumped public comment right up to the front of the meeting. There’s a Council president’s preview of the agenda. Besides transparency, I would add accessibility. We have a group on Council right now that’s the most accessible that you’ve ever had. You can call us, you can email us, you can pull me aside any time you want to discuss anything that’s on your mind. I think transparency and accessibility go hand in hand.

DH: All of our Council are volunteers, and they really are trying to do the best they can. Sometimes our Council packets are 200, 300 pages by the time they’re printed out, so you really do have to be paying attention to a lot of the issues. One of the issues I was frustrated with around transparency was gas-powered leaf blowers. The business owners were very hurt by the lack of communication initially, and that was, for me, one of the first things I noticed. Obviously Broad Street West, it’s quite honestly alarming how many people have come up one after another. These people are passionate about this, they want to be involved. They want to be a part of the project, of the plan. It’s important. It matters. Their voice matters.

If elected, what is the one thing you hope to accomplish during your tenure?

DH: That’s an easy one. I think bring some civility back to Summit. I think there’s way too much groupthink. We’re getting a little bit better. We’re all neighbors; we should not have divisive local politics. This is insanity. All of our children go to school together. We should only be focused on making Summit better. I want you to walk into that Council room if I get elected, and I want to see a smile on your face, and I want to smile back.

DO’S: I’m really proud of the accomplishments that I have been able to push forward thorough my first term. My focus in my second term will be to capture federal grant money from the infrastructure bill and the Inflation Reduction Act so that we can get our fleets changed over from gas-powered vehicles to electric. It’s really expensive, and it would be unaffordable for this City to take it on. There’s going to be grant money available. I’m going to fight for it so we can have a more renewable future.

Closing Statements

In closing, O’Sullivan noted that running for reelection “has allowed me to reflect and take stock of my first term. I’m extremely proud of what we were able to get done during a very challenging time in Summit. These are real, tangible things that make a difference in the quality of our lives. At the onset of COVID, I was part of a group of people who came together to save the downtown, and now our award-winning downtown is more vibrant and energetic than ever. In my first run for Council, I promised to address our outdoor recreation spaces and I delivered on that promise with a major investment in the town pool and new basketball courts at Tatlock and Memorial. As chair of Parking Services I directed the City to remove the Deforest lot gates, which saved Summit $750,000. We are continuing to plant trees to enhance our tree canopy, we have the tiny forest, we’re composting food at the transfer station. We live in a more welcoming community. These are just some of the things I’m most proud of. But there’s work to do, and we have challenges to overcome. If you reelect me, my focus will be on building strong consensus on Broad Street West, more investments in our playgrounds and parks. We need to capture federal infrastructure grant money to start converting our City fleet es to electric. And I will continue to attend Union County meetings to advocate for you, the people of Summit.”

Hamlet closed by pointing out that “the city of Summit could fundamentally change forever. Maintaining historic Summit is essential. You have my commitment to maintain and protect historical Summit as the city we choose to live and raise our children in. I encourage everyone as you leave the Library tonight, based upon what was originally in the [BSW] letter of intent that put the developers’ interests in front of residents’, you would literally run into massive apartment complexes smack in the middle of this lot and other City blocks. The next time you go to the train station, think about the leaders who fought to put the tracks underground. It wasn’t easy, but to use Millie Cooper’s words, ‘they fought like hell to get it right.’ Millie has reminded us there was a proposal to put City Hall on the Village Green, but they had to change direction due to public engagement with people who cherished green space ranswhere the community comes together. The possibilities for this space are endless. The more I door-knock, the more that’s crystal clear. Imagine how fabulous it could be. How about the people’s park, or Village Green II, as mentioned last week. How about a bandstand where all of our performing artists and musicians could perform? This could still include housing or recreational things for us and our children to enjoy. A few weeks ago I walked around with an artist and another resident. I would be able to show you renderings of what is possible. With your input over the next few months, we can make anything possible. One thing that is abundantly clear is that the silver lining of Broad Street West is that it has been the one thing that has bought Democrats and Republicans together for the first time in a long time. If Broad Street West is such a good idea, put it out on referendum and let the people decide. I ask you to put partisan politics aside on November 8. I will work hard to earn your vote and if elected I won’t stop door-knocking.

The general election is Tuesday, November 8; the deadline to register to vote is October 18, with early voting beginning October 29 and running through November 6. The full debate can be viewed at youtube.com/watch?v=TW5a4LQ37k4&t=18s.

2022 Summit Common Council Candidates Debate

September 29, 2022

The League of Women Voters hosted this debate at the Summit Free Public Library on September 28, 2022.

Now is That Time: Summit Police Issue Public Call to Find Life-Saving Donor

September 28, 2022

Living Donor Kidney Sought to Prolong Life of Summit Police Officer Karen Sauers

TAPinto Summit

SUMMIT, NJ – The City of Summit Police Department, Summit Fire Department, Summit PBA Local #55, Summit FMBA #54, Summit Volunteer First Aid Squad and City of Summit officials have partnered to raise awareness about the immediate need for a living donor kidney transplant for Summit Police Officer Karen Stenstrom Sauers.

At age 24, Sauers was diagnosed with polycystic kidney disease, an inherited disorder in which clusters of cysts develop primarily within the kidneys, causing them to enlarge and lose function over time. At the time of diagnosis, she was told that one day she would need a kidney transplant to prolong her life.

Now is that time.

Raised in Summit from the age of eight, Karen Stenstrom was a scholar and an athlete. She was co-captain of the women’s lacrosse team, graduated from Summit High School as part of the Class of 1989, and pursued a degree in education at Boston College. After graduation, she returned to Summit, began teaching in Newark public schools and volunteering on the Summit Volunteer First Aid Squad.

As she watched the twin towers fall on September 11, she realized that she was meant to serve the community differently, and enrolled in the John H. Stamler Police Academy. She is now a valued and decorated police officer in Summit and has served the community faithfully for more than 20 years.

Karen met and married Jon Sauers, also a Summit Police Department officer, and is a co-parent to Andy, age 20, and the devoted mother of 13-year-old twins Tommy and Maggie.

None of her immediate family or relatives are a match for a kidney transplant, so her life depends on receiving a donor kidney. She is a patient with the Living Donor Institute at Cooperman Barnabas Medical Center. The program allows patients with chronic kidney disease to receive kidney transplants from living donors and deceased donors as soon as possible.

While receiving a kidney from a deceased donor would prolong her life for a handful of years, a living donor kidney would extend Karen’s life expectancy for 10 to 15 more years.

“Officer Karen Sauers is one of the kindest and most positive individuals I know,” said Summit Police Chief Steven Zagorski. “Throughout her distinguished career with the agency and now on this difficult journey, she has shown great strength and commitment. As colleagues and friends, we want to do everything possible to help find a potential donor. Please consider learning more about it.”

For more information on the process of kidney donation, visit https://www.CBMCLivingDonor.org. Include the code KARENSAUERS if completing the health history questionnaire, so all potential matches are connected to Officer Sauers.

For more information on Officer Karen Stenstrom Sauers and the Summit Police Department visit https://www.cityofsummit.org/police or contact Nikki Griffiths at 908-277-9472.

Choice Is On the Ballot and Delia Hamlet is the Right One for Summit

September 27, 2022

TAPinto Summit

By Rachel Kramer

I’ve been a registered democrat for the entirety of my adult life and up until very recently, I could be what some might consider a “blue, no matter who,” voter. This changed in the Spring of 2021 when the Summit Common Council introduced an ordinance to ban gas-powered leaf blowers, in the middle of a pandemic. This is also the time that my path would cross with Delia Hamlet, Ward 1 Common Council candidate.  Delia and I began attending council meetings together, and we began speaking with landscapers who continued to communicate that their business was being negatively impacted, both to us as a listening ear, and to Common Council, continuously requesting a reversal on the ban or making it optional, to no avail. The answer, in short, was that the limited months were the compromise. 

I was shocked at the reaction of our elected officials when they were confronted with a perspective that was different from theirs, and the way that they spoke to hard-working individuals who came to meetings to express their disapproval. Unfortunately, this would only be a glimpse of what was to come when just a few short months later Summit had moved on from GLBs and BSW became the focus of the city’s attention.

We experienced a lot of the same issues with BSW, on a much bigger scale; an opaque process, minimal communication, incorrect information from hired experts, dismissal of Summit residents that were truly trying to help, and a complete disregard of facts, over and over and over again. After more than 5 months when hundreds of residents spoke out against BSW, wrote e-mails, and signed petitions, on June 21st, Council Person Danny O’Sullivan introduced an ordinance to send the amended redevelopment plan to the Planning Board for approval. This was not someone who had been “listening.”

I run around our city a lot and whenever I come across a sign that says, “choice is on the ballot,” I think about that in terms of the Summit we all know and love. This November choice is on the ballot, and Ward 1 residents can choose a candidate who will prioritize communication, collaboration, and a sense of community by putting Summit and its residents first. Summit would be incredibly lucky to have Delia Hamlet representing them and I hope that when you cast your vote on Tuesday, November 8th, or sooner, you make the choice for someone who is willing to listen, willing to compromise, and willing to do the hard work.

Rachel Kramer, Summit

No More Rubber Stamps On Council – Time To Bounce Danny

September 17, 2022

TAPinto Summit

By Patrick Nash

We all want our Summit Common Councilmembers to be successful in achieving what’s best for Summit and its residents. But I believe only the most equipped individuals should serve in that capacity as it’s imperative to our community’s success. As typical in Council elections, we need to choose the best candidate that will voice the community’s concerns and take action. 

I remember getting ready for dinner last spring and having my laptop on, listening to the Summit Common Council meeting. A resident started speaking and you could hear the passion as well as terror in her voice describing the recent kidnapping on her block. Both my wife and I stopped making dinner as we were intently listening to this resident- Delia Hamlet. 

At following Council meetings, Delia and others repeatedly spoke about residents that were hard hit by car thefts. I met one of those residents (a Democrat) and they said Councilmember Danny O’Sullivan came to their door recently with reelection material. They politely told him that after they repeatedly spoke at Council meetings and endured a house robbery, an attempted car theft with family outside as well as a kidnapping in front of their house, Danny never reached out to them. They told him he hadn’t earned their vote for reelection.

While attending Summit Common Council meetings these past eighteen months, Delia has become more engrossed in the Broad Street West Redevelopment (BSWR) process. She continually asked questions about the size as well as scope of the project. Delia was befuddled that Council repeatedly ignored the warnings of Summit residents to slow down the BSWR process and listen to residents. Despite many Council meetings and resident objections for months on end, Danny O’Sullivan remained 100% for the five-story monstrosity proposed to be plunked down at the corner of Broad Street/Morris Avenue in our beautiful downtown. His tone deafness on the BSWR proposal and comprehension of Summit resident’s serious concerns couldn’t be more on display than at the June 2022 meeting at the Community Center. Hundreds came out to voice their objections to amending the Redevelopment Plan with the stroke of a pen, and rewrite the zoning laws to further increase density as well as the size of the building in Subdistrict 3. People who were involved in creating the Master Plan and the Redevelopment Plan spoke as well, begging Council to follow the original plan.

After four hours of compelling resident testimony, without hesitation and not addressing any of the questions or concerns raised by residents that night, Councilmember Danny O’Sullivan pulled out a prepared written statement. He coolly introduced the ordinance to send the amended Redevelopment Plan forward to the Planning Board and voted in favor of it. It was a stunning display of aloofness which has been Danny O’Sullivan’s calling card for his entire tenure on Council. You can go back and watch any of the Summit Common Council meetings over the past two years on the City of Summit YouTube channel. As residents speak, Danny is fixated on his laptop or remaining silent while other Councilmembers were able to take notes as well as communicate with the public. Only recently, with his reelection at stake, has he suddenly found his “voice”. Regardless of the vote at hand for Council, Danny can be counted on to vote in line with all the other Democratic Councilmembers. Over the past two years he couldn’t even be bothered to have an actual Councilmember Facebook page like the other Councilmembers but resurrected one once campaign season hit. His only prominent social media post over his current term was to call one third of his Summit constituency stupid on his personal Twitter page. Never mind that he likely offended the vast majority of Summit residents who saw Danny behave in a manner unfit to serve ALL of Summit.

Summit residents need their voices to be heard by their seven elected Councilmembers. Right now, Summit Common Council suffers from a collective groupthink where all six Democrats vote in unison, regardless of the input from Summit residents. This couldn’t be any more self-evident than with BSWR where only a handful of residents spoke in favor of the proposal while 1,700 residents signed a petition asking to do better.

Right now there is simply too much at stake in our community, including BSWR, safety, traffic, our downtown, our schools and our taxes to have aloof rubber stamps like Danny O’Sullivan on Summit Common Council. Our community deserves transparency, accountability and above all respect from its Councilmembers. If we are ever going to have a say in what the future of Summit will look like and be, it’s time for the residents of Summit to send a message to the current Summit Common Council and bounce Danny from his seat. 

Patrick Nash, Summit

Summit Council: Stop Accommodating Toll/L&M, Regain Our Trust, and Do What’s Best for Summit

September 13, 2022

TAPinto Summit

By Steve Sartorius and Vicki Lederman

On Tuesday night, September 6, Summit City Council said they have heard us and have told Toll/L&M to come back with a revised proposal that adheres to the redevelopment plan, the master plan, zoning ordinances, and the perspectives of the Historic Preservation and other commissions. They seemed to think that this is a win and residents should be satisfied with this progress. This was not a win or an accomplishment: this was the starting point from which BSW proposals were to come forth. The fact residents have had to fight to even meet those basic standards originally set and approved by the City is absurd. Had these things been adhered to from the beginning, we’d be at least a year further down the path and with much greater goodwill and most importantly, greater trust between the city and residents.

If the developers can’t make a reasonable profit by adhering to those standards, why did they respond to the RFQ with a project proposal in the first place? That’s their poor business judgment and loss. This is our home and town and BSW needs to serve our needs and objectives. Summit does not exist for the purposes, or to pad the profits of, developers or consultants. We do not need to, and should not, accommodate them at the expense of our quality of life. It was their choice to answer the RFQ.

We have strongly advocated for the creation of a diverse, inclusive and open citizen advisory committee to help Council get the best for Summit in both financing and design, and many of us were eagerly waiting for the applications to join. Instead, Council’s resolution created a strictly financial, closed advisory committee that totally ignores design or any other aspect of this project, and only looks at subdistrict 3 in isolation. The exhaustive list of qualifications demanded to even apply for this committee, which no Council member even comes close to having, precludes the vast majority of residents from being on it. Further, Council has no obligation to abide by or even consider their recommendations.

While Council is at least willing to have qualified individuals advise on project financials, what we don’t understand is why Council is still set on “tweaking” this proposal without looking at other options that might work better. In any business endeavor, sometimes you just have cut your losses, pull the plug and start over. Regardless of the extent of the investment so far, if it just isn’t going to work, you get out before investing more and making the economic and time losses worse.

Council is throwing good money after bad and has lost the trust of many residents. After studying this redevelopment proposal in detail for months, it has become clear that we need to start over, with a project that meets Summit’s financial, housing, business, and lifestyle needs and wants.

Now however, we wonder if that is even an option, based on the comments of Council members Danny O’Sullivan and especially Susan Hairston at the Sept. 6 meeting. After O’Sullivan stated that “it’s now two four-story buildings,” Council President Fox explained “We actually have not seen a drawing of it, it’s just a conceptual discussion.” This was followed by Hairston’s comment: “Those of us who are saying revisit redevelopment, sorry, NO. We have as a community — we decided on that, and we will make the best out of it.”

This seems like another done deal just waiting to be signed once they finish “humoring” us that we’re being “heard”.

Steve Sartorius and Vicki Lederman, Summit

Time to Pull the Plug on the Broad Street West Redevelopment Plan

September 12, 2022

TAPinto Summit

By John Miano

While the community is the midst of a break in the Broad Street West redevelopment plan (the fire station property), it is time to consider the obvious option for the fire station property that has been ignored. That is, get rid of the redevelopment plan, sell the property at a public action (as is normally required by law), and allow the buyer to build under the zoning (commercial, maximum of three stories).

Redevelopment is the statutory process for municipalities to address blighted areas as permitted by the state constitution. The redevelopment process was not intended as a mechanism for bypassing the statutory requirement for selling valuable public real property (such as fire station parcel) at auction. It would be hard to find any place in Summit that would legitimately qualify as blighted.

Council gave the community three general reasons for using the redevelopment process for the fire station property: financial benefit, affordable housing, and getting what the community wanted. So far, the redevelopment process has been a complete failure at all three goals.

In regard to finances, the city signed a letter of intent with the developers under which the fire station property ostensibly would be sold for $8M. In addition the agreement had the city supplying massive corporate welfare in the form of a $1.75M Development Area Bond (RAB) and a Payment in Lieu of Taxes (PILOT) that would save the developer about $18M in taxes over 30 years. The present value of the PILOT to the developer would have been around $9M–$11M  (depending upon the interest rate). When you subtract the present value of the corporate welfare from the sale price, you find that the agreement under the letter of intent would have the City of Summit effectively paying the developers $3M–$5M to take the property off our hands. 

As a means of addressing financial issues, the redevelopment process has been an abject failure.

Worse yet, the $8M proposed sale price is likely to be well under the true market value. Council stated that the $8M price was the best it could get under the redevelopment plan. The value of the property to a developer depends upon what the developer will build. Yet no alternatives to maximize the value of property have received serious consideration. Off-the-cuff estimates based upon comparables (including the City’s own purchase of part of the parcel on Cedar St.) I have received from those in the business suggest the market value without the redevelopment plan could be as much as $16M and $30M, depending up on what would be built. 

Astonishingly, while of hundreds of thousand of dollars have flowed to consultants as part of the redevelopment process, the city has not had an appraisal done to find the true market value of the property without the redevelopment plan.

In return for the massive direct corporate welfare and the likely underpricing of the property under the letter of intent, the city would have received the absolute minimum number of affordable housing units required by law.  That would not even qualify as consideration in contract law. The corporate welfare from the taxpayers under the letter of intent is almost $200,000 per unit of affordable housing. If the true market value of the property is $16M (a minimum indicated by city’s own purchase), the combination of corporate welfare and underpricing the property could have the city expending nearly $600,000 per unit of affordable housing. The same financial investment could build much more affordable housing by other means.

Meanwhile there are other development projects taking place in the City of Summit that are providing the same percentage of affordable housing without any corporate welfare at all. The redevelopment plan is a highly inefficient means for the City to provide affordable housing and the need for affordable housing provides no justification for the Broad Street West redevelopment plan.

As far as getting what the community wanted, redevelopment produced a plan for massive, cheap “5-over-1” building, with inadequate parking that would have been uglier than a baboon’s rear end. Few people in Summit wanted such a building. As a means of controlling what would be built, the redevelopment plan has been a total failure. The underlying zoning (without the redevelopment plan) would have provided the community better control than the redevelopment plan.

The Broad Street West redevelopment plan has been a comprehensive failure at meeting any of the goals Council put forth to justify its existence. In light of this failure, it is commendable that Council has paused the redevelopment process. Now is time to consider alternative means of dealing with the fire station property. 

The City of Summit needs to have appraisal done of the fire station that estimates the market value of the property for commercial development under the zoning and without the redevelopment plan that considers different types of construction. If the market value of the property is incrementally greater than the value under the redevelopment plan, the redevelopment plan should be repealed, payments to redevelopment consultants should cease, and the property should be sold at auction to bring the maximum value to the residents.

In parallel, it should be made clear to developers that any proposed project under the redevelopment process must conform to the redevelopment plan and the zoning requirements. Any proposal must satisfy the density and size requirements. Any proposal must provide all the required parking for any residents and businesses on-site because on street parking is totally unacceptable to the community. The reality of geometry is that, with a single level of parking, the fire station property can fit about 60 units of housing with 10,000 sf. of retail or 80 units of housing and no retail. Any proposal for denser construction is dead on arrival and would further erode the already tenuous credibility of council with the community.

John Miano, Summit

Delia Hamlet Running for Summit Common Council Ward 1 Seat

July 3, 2022

TAPinto Summit

SUMMIT, NJ – Delia Hamlet is running for election to the Summit Common Council, seeking to claim the Ward 1 seat currently held by Democrat Danny O’Sullivan. In announcing Hamlet’s candidacy, the Summit Republican City Committee noted Hamlet was written-in on the June 7 Primary ballot.

A United State Army Veteran, Hamlet is currently a partner and Chief Operating Officer at the Fort Athletic Club in Fort Monmouth, where she is responsible for all operational aspects of the 50,000 square foot fitness facility. She has lived in Summit for more than 10 years, where she is an active member of the community and mother of three children, who all attend the Summit Public School System.

“I am honored that my fellow Summit residents have put their faith in me to address the serious issues facing our community. While it was not my original intention to run for office, I’m ready to serve as I have for my entire life. I love our city, and I’ll spend the next four months hearing the concerns of our neighbors and working to earn their vote,” said Hamlet, adding, “My top priority is fighting the proposed overdevelopment that will dramatically increase traffic and demand on our already strained infrastructure. I will also continue to work with the residents of Summit for the resources needed to make our town safer and pledge to be a check and balance on the city budget.”